A recent investigation by Reuters has brought to light the significant political ties of Nobitex, Iran’s dominant cryptocurrency exchange. The report identifies the exchange’s founders as Ali and Mohammad Kharrazi, brothers belonging to one of Iran’s most influential political families. Their family connections extend to all three of Iran’s Supreme Leaders, a detail underscored by their use of an alternative surname, Aghamir Mohammad Ali, for business and academic registrations, while publicly using the Kharrazi name.
Key Takeaways
- Nobitex, Iran’s largest crypto exchange, was founded by Ali and Mohammad Kharrazi, who are allegedly related by marriage to Iran’s Supreme Leaders and used an alias for official registrations.
- Reuters’ investigation suggests hundreds of millions of dollars in transactions linked to sanctioned Iranian entities, including the Central Bank and the IRGC, have passed through Nobitex since 2018.
- Despite recent U.S. sanctions targeting Iran’s financial infrastructure, Nobitex and its founders have not been directly designated by Western governments.
- The exchange claims to serve approximately 11 million users and handle a substantial majority of Iran’s crypto trading volume.
The Kharrazi brothers reportedly established Nobitex in 2018, alongside CEO Amir Hosein Rad. Their family’s political prominence is notable; their grandfather was a member of the Assembly of Experts, the body responsible for selecting Iran’s Supreme Leader. Furthermore, their father, Ayatollah Bagher Kharrazi, is credited with founding a political organization distinct from the Lebanese Hezbollah and is said to have played a role in staffing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) following the 1979 revolution. Reuters substantiated these familial and political links by cross-referencing various Iranian public records, including corporate and banking documents, and noting that an email address used for Nobitex’s domain registration contained the Kharrazi name and was associated with a charity led by the brothers’ father.
In response to the Reuters report, Nobitex issued a statement denying any governmental affiliation. The exchange asserted that the brothers had not altered their identities and that any illicit funds processed through the platform represented a “very small fraction of overall volume” and occurred without the knowledge of management. Iranian government officials did not provide comments to Reuters.
Analysis of Potential Regulatory Precedent
The findings regarding Nobitex and its alleged ties to sanctioned Iranian entities raise critical questions about the effectiveness of global sanctions regimes and the role of cryptocurrency exchanges in facilitating financial flows that circumvent these restrictions. The situation could set a precedent for how regulatory bodies, particularly in the U.S. and Europe, approach exchanges operating in jurisdictions subject to extensive sanctions. If evidence mounts that exchanges are knowingly or unknowingly facilitating transactions for sanctioned state actors or entities, it could lead to more aggressive enforcement actions, including designations and potential extraterritorial reach of sanctions. The lack of designation for Nobitex, despite significant reported transaction volumes linked to sanctioned Iranian institutions, highlights a potential gap in current regulatory oversight. This could prompt a review of designation criteria and the intelligence gathering processes used to identify and target illicit financial activities within the digital asset space. Furthermore, the case might influence the development of global regulatory frameworks, such as Europe’s MiCA, by emphasizing the need for robust Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements for all cryptocurrency service providers, regardless of their location, especially when dealing with transactions potentially originating from or destined for sanctioned regions.
Reuters’ investigation also pointed to substantial financial activity involving Nobitex. While estimates of illicit volumes vary among blockchain analytics firms—with Elliptic identifying around $366 million, Chainalysis closer to $68 million, and Crystal Intelligence around $22 million in direct transfers from sanctioned wallets—all firms suggest the actual figures are likely higher. An Elliptic analysis reportedly indicated that wallets controlled by Iran’s Central Bank transferred approximately $347 million to Nobitex in the first half of 2025, as part of a larger crypto acquisition program. Additionally, one of Nobitex’s early significant investors, Mohammad Bagher Nahvi, is reportedly the vice chairman of Safiran Airport Services, a company sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury for its involvement in coordinating flights for Iranian drone shipments to Russia.
Further scrutiny arose from a dispute involving Iranian businessman Babak Zanjani and Iran’s Central Bank, which inadvertently revealed wallet addresses. These addresses allowed analysts to trace at least $20 million in central bank funds that had allegedly been channeled through Nobitex. The exchange has reportedly continued to process transactions even amid heightened geopolitical tensions and nationwide internet disruptions in Iran, with analytics firms noting over $100 million in transactions during a recent conflict period. Significant outflows, totaling $54 million, have been observed since the conflict began, with much of these funds reportedly moving abroad to be converted into cash.
Despite the U.S. Treasury’s recent sanctions targeting Iran’s “shadow banking infrastructure,” Nobitex was not included in the designated entities. Similarly, there is no indication that any members of the Kharrazi family have been sanctioned by Western governments. Senator Elizabeth Warren has described these findings as a “red flag,” emphasizing the use of digital assets by adversaries to circumvent the U.S.-led financial system. Previous reports indicated that Binance handled billions of dollars for Nobitex clients, notwithstanding U.S. sanctions; the exchange did not comment on the latest findings. The case of Binance and its former CEO, Changpeng Zhao, underscores the increasing regulatory scrutiny faced by major cryptocurrency platforms concerning sanctions compliance.
According to the portal: www.theblock.co