A report released by the UK House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee suggests that the United Kingdom is falling behind both the United States and the European Union in establishing effective regulatory frameworks for stablecoins. The committee has called for revisions to proposed rules by the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), arguing that certain provisions could hinder the growth of the domestic stablecoin market before it has a chance to mature.
Key Takeaways
- The UK House of Lords committee has identified specific stablecoin regulations proposed by the Bank of England and the FCA as potentially detrimental to market growth.
- Concerns were raised regarding requirements for unremunerated central bank deposits, holding limits for stablecoins, and restrictions on commercial bank involvement in stablecoin issuance.
- The FCA’s “k-factor” capital requirement, which is tied to issuance volume rather than risk, was also flagged as a potential impediment to the growth of GBP-denominated stablecoins.
- The committee urged greater clarity from HM Treasury on systemic designation criteria for stablecoins and recommended a joint assessment of existing frameworks for combating illicit finance through unhosted wallets.
- The report highlights the dominance of USD-denominated stablecoins globally and the nascent state of the UK’s GBP stablecoin market.
While the committee generally supports the proposed regulatory framework for systemic and non-systemic sterling stablecoins, it has pinpointed several elements that it believes are not competitive with international standards. The report, titled “Stablecoins: waiting for regulation,” emphasizes the need for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while ensuring robust risk mitigation.
Regulatory Precedent and Global Competition
The committee’s findings signal a critical juncture for the UK’s digital asset regulation, particularly concerning stablecoins, which are foundational to many digital asset ecosystems. The proposed rules, if implemented as is, could create a less attractive environment for stablecoin issuers compared to jurisdictions with more accommodating frameworks. This could lead to a competitive disadvantage, pushing innovation and market activity towards the US and EU, potentially impacting the UK’s position as a global financial center.
A primary area of contention is the Bank of England’s proposal for systemic sterling stablecoin issuers to maintain at least 40% of their backing assets in unremunerated central bank deposits. The committee advocates for more detailed analysis of these requirements and suggests that the Bank of England consider remunerating these deposits at the base rate. Furthermore, a more principles-based approach to the overall asset composition of backing reserves is recommended over highly prescriptive rules.
The proposed holding limits of £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses are also under scrutiny. The committee argues against the pre-emptive imposition of such limits, suggesting instead a strategy of market monitoring and intervention only when clear financial stability risks emerge. The report notes that these caps could be commercially detrimental and practically challenging to enforce, and importantly, are not mirrored in regulations of other major jurisdictions.
Restrictions on commercial banks engaging in stablecoin issuance, as currently stipulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), are also deemed too restrictive. The PRA’s requirement for stablecoin issuance to be conducted by insolvency-remote entities under separate branding is seen as an unnecessary barrier. The committee urges a revision of these requirements, even in light of a recent “Dear CEO” letter from the PRA that reaffirmed its stance.
Additionally, the FCA’s prudential “k-factor” requirement is questioned. This metric, which scales based on the volume of stablecoins in circulation rather than the inherent risks, is considered by the committee potentially unsuitable for accurately assessing issuers’ capital needs and could stifle the growth of GBP-denominated stablecoins.
HM Treasury is also called upon to provide clarity regarding the criteria for designating a stablecoin as “systemic,” recommending the publication of quantitative thresholds to offer greater certainty to market participants. A joint assessment by HM Treasury, the FCA, and the Bank of England is proposed to determine if current legal frameworks are adequate for detecting and preventing illicit financial activities involving private, unhosted wallets. The committee suggests that legislative measures to restrict the use of such wallets should be prepared if deemed necessary.
The report highlights the significant global market for stablecoins, estimated at approximately $315 billion, with over 99% denominated in US dollars, and led by tokens from Tether and Circle. In contrast, the UK-issued tGBP had a market capitalization of only $1.53 million. The FCA’s comprehensive cryptoasset regime is anticipated to be fully operational by October 25, 2027.
The global stablecoin market is dominated by U.S. dollar stablecoins and evolved to serve crypto asset trading. The UK is lagging behind compared with the U.S. and the EU, but is now moving in the right direction. Regulation needs to allow innovation while ensuring that risks are effectively mitigated.
Learn more at : www.theblock.co